2. Bailey v. Barbour, 2014 ONSC 3698
[50] It was argued by Mr. Fenn that Mr. Barbour must have known that Mr. Stewart was biased, as he was in Court throughout the trial, and accordingly must have known of the issue of bias. I am not satisfied that this is true, as there is some evidence suggesting that Mr. Barbour was not kept fully engaged in this litigation in the way one might expect.
http://www.slaw.ca/2014/07/02/wednesday-whats-hot-on-canlii-75/