(56) During argument of the plaintiff’s objection to Dr. Bail testifying as an expert, I expressed concern upon reading Dr. Bail’s report as to what appeared to be an adversarial format and some of the content of the report. My concern was whether Dr. Bail’s testimony would be fair, objective, non-adversarial and be limited to his capacity as a psychiatrist.
(125) I will not qualify witnesses as experts in the future whose reports present an approach similar to that of Dr. Bail in this case.