[66] And in the present case there was no evidence of any lack of independence or lack of objectivity on the part of Dr. Anton. Mr. Kirby was on a fishing expedition asking questions that on the facts of the case he had no business asking. They were improper and should not have been permitted.
[67] That said, Dr. Anton handled himself well in the circumstances. When counsel asked him a similar series of questions in relation to a second report that he prepared on behalf of the appellant, and whether he thought it “fair, and objective, and nonpartisan to have these secret discussions with plaintiff’s counsel before you write a report?” he responded: