In 2015, the appeals tribunal ruled that the board’s medical consultant was not “persuasive” because he “did not provide reasons to support his conclusion.” While Winegarden did have a pre-existing back condition, the tribunal found there was “no evidence of significance” to suggest it had interfered with his work until his accident — meaning he could not be denied benefits by the board.
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education