• FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education

IME

S.M. v M.S.R., 2016 CanLII 84119 (ON HPARB)

http://canlii.ca/t/gvx92

  1. 4.                The Applicant was involved in an ongoing accident benefits claim with her own insurer and an ongoing civil action regarding the motor vehicle accidents. From 2006 to 2014, she attended more than 40 independent medical examinations (IMEs) in relation to her accident benefits claim and civil action.
  1. 6.                By letter dated February 17, 2015, the Applicant complained to the College about the Respondent’s conduct at the IME. She expressed concern as follows:

 

  1. i)                  “at an IME with [the Respondent] I felt so uncomfortable that at one point I excused myself, went outside and felt suicidal.  He came out to get me and I returned to complete the session…”
  2. ii)                “I don’t recall exactly what we were talking about but all of a sudden I felt like my whole world was coming to an end. It was the way he was asking me questions… I felt as if he had led me on with his friendliness and then used some kind of interrogation technique, like they would use with a criminal or in a war zone …”

iii)               “Upon leaving I felt as if I had been mentally raped.”

  1. iv)             “I continue to suffer severe stress and anxiety attacks relating to this incident.”

Comments are closed.