IME

G.P., a 72-year-old Polish woman, was in a car accident on November 9, 2013 and sought benefits pursuant to the SABs.  She applied for several automobile accident benefits which were denied by Cumis.  As a result, she filed an Application with the LAT to dispute these of benefits.  G.P. also claimed that she had been catastrophically impaired as a result of the accident.  She submitted two assessments in support of this claim, one by a general practitioner, Dr. ZM, and one by a psychiatrist, Dr. M.

https://www.deutschmannlaw.com/blog/post/assessments-ruled-not-reasonable-nor-necessary-for-hearing-to-proceed-on-cat-determination-gp-v-cumis16-003144aabs