A recent decision, Sacks v. Ross, 2016 ONSC 2498, considered whether to grant an order fixing costs in favour of a defendant against the unsuccessful plaintiff. In discussing the principles of awarding costs, Justice Wilson cited the fact that plaintiffs could purchase adverse cost insurance as a form of protection in litigation. In Justice Wilson’s view, this would enable access to justice for plaintiffs by making it easier to advance challenging but meritorious claims.
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education