So, I see a twitter link to a new court case where an insurance defence expert is criticized for failing to understand his role as an objective expert. The court says that the doctor mischaracterized his current practice and experience in order to downplay the amount of insurance defence work he had done and play up the inaccurate idea that he was still a practising specialist at a major health institute. The Court found that the doctor was not credible or reliable. It stated that “Dr. Hershberg was cavalier in his approach to the requirement to be accurate with respect to his curriculum vitae, when obtaining information from the plaintiff during the examination, and in reporting as to the information he obtained from the plaintiff.”
http://iavgo.org/why-arent-we-