• FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education

IME

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

The Court of Appeal’s decision is an important warning to physicians conducting paper-only IMEs.
Such paper-based reviews will still attract a duty of care to the patient. Justice Hoegg reinforced that the doctor-patient relationship gives rise to a duty of care when the doctor’s actions have the “potential” to affect the patient’s interests. Paper-only IMEs conducted for the purpose of evaluating insurance claims will inherently affect the interests of the claimant patient.
Insurers and consulting physicians will undoubtedly have to consider the potential liabilities associated with paper-based IMEs in light of this decision.

Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32 (CanLII),

<http://canlii.ca/t/h3vdf

Comments are closed.