On March 15, 2017, the LAT issued its final decision in this matter arising under the SABs). The main issues before the Tribunal were whether AT was entitled to certain medical benefits, specifically chiropractic and massage therapy treatment, as well as the cost of an examination for a chronic pain assessment. The Tribunal determined that AT was not entitled to any of the claimed medical benefits, but found that AT should receive the chronic pain assessment. Aviva asked that the decision be reconsidered.
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education