“Judges are expected to distinguish the scientific wheat from the pseudoscientific chaff. Yet most judges do not have the ability to fulfill this responsibility adequately. They have little or no background in science. Indeed, many went to law school because they were straight-A students in history or sociology but had no appetite for biology or statistics. As a practical matter, judges have largely failed in carrying out their responsibilities to evaluate the science offered in their courtrooms.”
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education