Author Archives: Admin4

Contingency fees ensure access to justice

Contingency fees, where lawyers charge a percentage of the damages recovered, are synonymous with access to justice. This fact has been repeated by numerous Courts at all levels. Perhaps the most eloquent statement is that of Justice Peter Cory who in Coronation Insurance Co. v. Florence [1994] S.C.J. No. 116 noted that the aim of a contingency fee “ … is to make court proceedings available to people who could not otherwise afford to have their legal rights determined. This is indeed a commendable goal that should be encouraged.

https://www.thelawyersdaily.ca/articles/3033/contingency-fees-ensure-access-to-justice

Cyclist Hit by a Car. What do you do?

As a cyclist what do you do if you are hit by a car? How do you navigate the legal, insurance and healthcare systems? What are you entitled to? Saul gets help from lawyer, Patrick Brown and Bike Law.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fubvbyZACzI&t=28s

ICBC’s anti-fraud advertising: purely educational or jury interference?

Earlier this year British Columbia’s public auto insurer, the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, released a new “anti-fraud” TV commercial featuring an adorable ginger-haired little boy wearing his dad’s hard hat, standing at the front of his elementary school classroom, delivering his presentation on Career Day

https://www.thelawyersdaily.ca/articles/3772/icbc-s-anti-fraud-advertising-purely-educational-or-jury-interference-sandra-kovacs?category=columnists

Chronic Pain Removes Applicant from MIG


Mr. Maverick Sleep was injured in a car accident as a passenger in a car that was hit from the side on March 26, 2014. He sought accident benefits from Aviva payable under the Schedule, however, when the parties were unable to resolve their disputes through mediation Mr. Sleep applied for arbitration at the FSCO.

https://www.deutschmannlaw.com/blog/post/chronic-pain-removes-applicant-from-mig

Ontario watchdog to probe driver’s licence snafus

The Ontario Ombudsman wants to slam the brakes on the practice of government failing to tell drivers when their licences are suspended and reinstated.

https://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2017/05/24/watchdog-to-probe-drivers-licence-snafus.html

Driver 25% At Fault For Being Rear Ended Due to “Sudden Stop”

In today’s case (Gibson v. Matthies) the Plaintiff was operating a motorcycle travelling behind the Defendant.  The Defendant brought his vehicle to a “sudden stop” prior to attempting a left hand turn.  The Plaintiff was unable to react in time and rear-ended the Defendant vehicle.  The Court found that the Plaintiff was negligent but also gave the Defendant 25% of the blame for his sudden stop.

http://www.ilstv.com/driver-25-fault-rear-ended-due-sudden-stop/

IBC launches summer-long auto insurance awareness tour

The Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) has launched a campaign aimed at educating consumers about their auto insurance policies.

Entitled “Time to Talk: Auto Insurance,” the educational tour’s first stop was in Hamilton, where it featured interactive displays and on-site advice.

http://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/ca/news/breaking-news/ibc-launches-summerlong-auto-insurance-awareness-tour-68455.aspx

Insurers don’t have to advise clients about limitation period

A recent decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that, in the absence of a statutory requirement, an insurer has no obligation to advise the insured about the running of a limitation period as part of its duty of good faith.

http://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/ca/news/breaking-news/insurers-dont-have-to-advise-clients-about-limitation-period-68458.aspx

How Much LAT-itude Will the Divisional Court Give On Judicial Review of a LAT “Non” Decision? Aviva Canada Inc. v. Taylor 2017 ONSC 2661

Mr. Taylor brought an Application to the LAT with respect to benefits denied in regards to a July 2015 incident. Mr. Taylor had been the passenger on an ATV that crashed. Mr. Taylor suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the incident. However, the central issue was whether or not Mr. Taylor had been involved in an “accident” pursuant to the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.

http://www.ztgh.com/resources/blog/how-much-lat-itude-will-the-divisional-court-give-on-judicial-review-of-a-lat-non-decision-aviva-canada-inc-v-taylor-2017-onsc-2661

Legal Matters: Can I still receive Ontario Disability Support Payments if I win a lawsuit against the at-fault driver?

I am receiving Ontario Disability Support payments (ODSP).  I was involved in a car accident that was not my fault and I have sued the at-fault driver.  Will a settlement of my lawsuit affect my receipt of ODSP benefits?

http://www.thespec.com/shopping-story/7331237-legal-matters-can-i-still-receive-ontario-disability-support-payments-if-i-win-a-lawsuit-against-th/