• FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education

Latest News Articles

FAIR does not accept responsibility for comments, opinions, statistical information etc. associated with the links listed below. Any opinions, points of view, etc. are not necessarily shared by FAIR.

For a complete list of recent articles, please go to our 'Media Articles' page under 'In the News'.
We are updating our site and we appreciate your patience.

One in 10 polled Canadians admit to driving under the influence of marijuana, State Farm Canada survey finds

One in 10 respondents to a recent State Farm Canada survey admit that they have driven under the influence of marijuana (45% within the past 12 months), but nearly half this group said they don’t believe marijuana impacts their ability to drive safely.

http://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/insurance/one-10-polled-canadians-admit-driving-influence-marijuana-state-farm-canada-survey-finds-1004111937/

Lawyer doubts new impaired driving bill will get past constitutional scrutiny

Legalizing marijuana was of course the main focus in Ottawa on Thursday, yet at the same time that it announced proposed legislation on the issue, the federal government also indicated it will toughen the laws around driving when impaired by alcohol.

Opioids Are Necessary for Some

There has been a great deal of news coverage lately about the scourge of opioid abuse in Canada. This is rightfully a huge concern, but some of the actions being taken in this new war on addiction are hurting people who have a demonstrated legitimate need for extremely strong pain relief measures. In some cases of long term, chronic, acute, or extreme pain opioids can help patients make it through the day. For some people the reality is that without the extremely potent painkillers life becomes unbearable.

Nemchin v Green, 2017 ONSC 2283 (CanLII)

[21]           Dr. Hershberg testified that for the past five years or so, 80 to 90 per cent of his income has been generated from conducting defence medical examinations – for defendants in litigation or for insurers in responding to claims.  He estimated that (a) as of 2014 he did 80 to 90 assessments per year and (b) in the five years leading up to the date of trial he had done 400 to 500 assessments in total.  He charges $600 per hour for his services.
[22]           In cross-examination, Dr. Hershberg acknowledged that his curriculum vitae does not portray the extent to which he has been doing assessments for the past five or more years.
[23]           Dr. Hershberg’s experience in conducting assessments includes doing other types of assessments within the motor vehicle insurance system and the Workplace Safety and Insurance context.  The majority of the information about Dr. Hershberg’s assessment work appears in his curriculum vitae under the heading “Ontario Insurance Commission” (the “Commission”).  I find that the appearance created by the manner in which that work is described and included in the curriculum vitae is that the work is in some way done under the auspices of the Commission.  In addition, the manner in which that work is described and is included in the curriculum vitae serve to downplay the prevalence in Dr. Hershberg’s work of the defence medical examinations and assessments for insurers.
[24]           Based on Dr. Hershberg’s level of experience in conducting defence medical and other assessments, I draw the following inferences:
         He is aware that his qualifications are not likely to be tested on cross-examination unless and until the dispute proceeds to trial or to an arbitration;
         He knows that a copy of his curriculum vitae is provided with his reports when they are served on an opposing party and may be provided to the Court in the course of litigation, the latter including for the purpose of pre-trial conferences;
         He understands that the contents of his report are considered, at least in part, in light of his qualifications and experience as set out in his curriculum vitae;
         He is aware that the contents of his report may play a role in the settlement positions adopted by parties to a dispute; and
         He is aware that the contents of his report, including in the light of his experience as detailed in his curriculum vitae, may contribute to settlement recommendations made by judges and others presiding over pre-trial and other forms of settlement conferences.
[25]           It is troubling to me that Dr. Hershberg, carrying out the type of work that he does and understanding the purpose served by his curriculum vitae and reports, is not more careful with respect to the accuracy of and the impression left by the information set out in his curriculum vitae.
[26]           I am also concerned by the lack of attention to accuracy demonstrated by the manner in which Dr. Hershberg dealt with the mechanics of the collision – both when he interviewed the plaintiff and when giving evidence at trial.  Dr. Hershberg testified that he made notes while interviewing the plaintiff.  At the end of the day on which the examination was conducted he would, as was his practice, have dictated his report relying at least in part on his notes.

Observations about the Marshall Report: Everything Old is New Again

Mr. Marshall is right about simplification of the policy. We can all applaud that attempt. It requires a ground-up redraft with no sacred cows. Unlike Mr. Marshall’s understanding of the initial purpose of the policy of no-fault benefits which he sees as controlling costs of auto insurance,  its initial purpose was to provide distributive compensation to those who were at fault and not at fault, and to tide innocent victims over until their cases could be tried or otherwise resolved.

Ontario should create ‘list of documents that must be produced’ in personal injury auto lawsuits: Marshall

The Ontario government should consider allowing auto insurers to offer consumers more choices and come up with new rules for the tort system bearing in mind that personal injury auto lawsuits “seldom involve complex issues of law,” a special adviser to the finance minister suggested this week.

Mike Smitiuch talks about high insurance rates

“rather than spend money on treatment, they will spend thousands to have you assessed by their own doctors”

Steve Kee – Director, Media & Digital Communications Insurance Bureau of Canada

Ontario roads safest in country but drivers pay the highest premium, new report says.

Report gives Ontario a failing grade for poor state of auto insurance

Ontario might have some of the safest roads in North America, but a recent report found that the province pays some of the highest premiums in all of Canada.

Ontario auto insurance system gets a fail

The inescapable conclusion of a new Ontario report on auto insurance is that drivers in this province are being bilked for billions of dollars.
And that our mandatory car insurance system is both perilously broken and fundamentally fails to serve victims.