• FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education

Latest News Articles

FAIR does not accept responsibility for comments, opinions, statistical information etc. associated with the links listed below. Any opinions, points of view, etc. are not necessarily shared by FAIR.

For a complete list of recent articles, please go to our 'Media Articles' page under 'In the News'.
We are updating our site and we appreciate your patience.

LETTER OF THE LAW: Benefits cut, so why are premiums still high?

Before September 1, 2010, if you were injured in a car crash, your basic auto insurance would provide you with $100,000 of coverage to pay for needed medical and rehabilitation benefits to get you back to work and recover from your injuries. This basic coverage would cover you for 10 years.

http://inquinte.ca/story/letter-of-the-law-benefits-cut-so-why-are-premiums-still-high

Rastin aims to be accident victims’ knight in shining armour

“I was always interested in the knights defending the weak, the oppressed against the oppressor,” says Rastin, managing partner of Rastin & Associates, a litigation firm with offices in Barrie, Midland, Orillia, Collingwood and Owen Sound. “I’ve always viewed the type of work that we do as being the closest thing to being a modern knight in our society.”

http://www.advocatedaily.com/steve-rastin-rastin-aims-to-be-accident-victims-knight-in-shining-armour.html

Hold the Phone: Telephone Hearings and Access to Justice

The telephone is old technology. Recent reports have shown that speaking by phone may be on the way out. However, the telephone is still an important part of the toolkit for tribunals in ensuring access to justice. Videoconferencing is the (relatively) new flavour in administrative justice, but we shouldn’t lose sight of the telephone as an accessible and technologically easier tool.

http://www.slaw.ca/2017/03/03/hold-the-phone-telephone-hearings-and-access-to-justice/

OT Success at the LAT

For those working in the personal injury and medical-legal fields, you will be familiar with the new License Appeal Tribunal (LAT).  This LAT, effective April 1, 2016 was FSCO’s solution to long wait lists in the previous SABS mediation process whereby insurers and claimants essentially try to resolve disputes about claimant’s benefits, rehabilitation, or other denials and discrepancies. 

http://solutionsforliving.ca/2017/03/ot-success-at-the-lat.html

Update: Fire chief won’t issue fee for nonresident car accidents until discretionary bylaw is in effect

A visit to Brantford may cost more than visitors bargain for.

When the 2017 budget passed at the end of January, the City of Brantford approved a motor vehicle collision fee for nonresidents in the fire department’s budget.

http://www.brantnews.com/news-story/7164032-update-fire-chief-won-t-issue-fee-for-nonresident-car-accidents-until-discretionary-bylaw-is-in-eff/

ATVs, Automobiles, and Jurisdictions (Oh My!)

Does an ATV become an “automobile” under Ontario insurance law if it is involved in an accident outside Ontario?

In Benson v. Belair, an Ontario resident fell off the back of an All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) in Fort Nelson, British Columbia. He sustained a severe traumatic brain injury. The ATV, owned and operated by a BC resident, was not required to be insured under an automobile policy in BC and it was not insured.

http://www.samislaw.com/atvs–automobiles–and-jurisdictions–oh-my?utm_content=buffer9013d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#.WLt3lbk_nok.buffer

Ontario Works and ODSP aren’t enough to live on, Toronto residents say

Maxine wants people who think the province’s ODSP benefits are enough to live three months in her shoes.

Those shoes were a gift from a friend. So was the jacket she wore as Maxine and others demonstrated outside a Weston-area office to argue Ontario Works and the Ontario Disability Support Program payments are too low.

http://www.insidetoronto.com/news-story/7167836-ontario-works-and-odsp-aren-t-enough-to-live-on-toronto-residents-say/?platform=hootsuite

Demolition of UK welfare state planned with corporate America

It has been obvious for a long time that the majority of the national press have colluded with the UK government to successfully manipulate the British public regarding the ongoing ‘welfare reforms’, which really means welfare destruction.

http://www.welfareweekly.com/demolition-of-uk-welfare-state-planned-with-corporate-america/

Why advances in treating those with brain injuries require advances in respecting their rights

Several years ago a father approached me, concerned about the care his son was receiving. The son had been in a car accident that left him with severe brain injury. He was placed in a nursing home, and his dad stopped by regularly to check in on him. The father feared his son was being ignored or, worse, left in pain or distress.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-conversation-us/why-advances-in-treating_b_14476796.html?

Gilbert’s LLP v David Dixon Inc., 2017 ONSC 1345 (CanLII)

[6]               This case raises an important procedural issue respecting the avenues of recourse that are available to a lawyer for the purpose of pursuing a client for payment of his/her fees.  It involves a consideration of the Solicitors Act, and its various provisions that purport to address this issue.  As I will explain below, the issue arises from the outdated and impractical processes contemplated by the Solicitors Act for the collection of legal accounts, which have been compounded by the failure of the Ministry of the Attorney General to properly resource the assessment process, that is provided for in the Solicitors Act.  The problem is further compounded by the confusing and problematic language used in the Solicitors Act, that renders any coherent understanding of the objectives of that statute virtually impossible.  On that latter point, I note the following statement from the covering letter of the Ontario Law Reform Commission that enclosed its 1973 Report on the Solicitors Act.  The Commission said:

The Solicitors Act is based on English legislation and practice which in some respects is no longer suitable to the needs of current Ontario practice.  In many instances, the language used in the present statute is archaic and obscure, and has caused difficulty in interpretation.