• FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education

The Laywers

‘FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education’

The information provided below is not legal advice, and it may not apply in every situation. FAIR is not a legal service and we do not recommend particular lawyers or firms. We do not provide legal advice. This page is for information purposes only.

ALERT

We are hearing about more and more cases where the time limitations for filing have lapsed due to a failure by a plaintiff’s legal representative to meet deadlines. Claimants should stay informed of what is happening with their files and forms and ask the questions about filing dates and limitations. Please see some of the decisions and articles listed at the bottom of this page for details

More information on choosing a lawyer or if you have issues with your legal bill here.

***************************************

FAIR does not accept responsibility for comments, opinions, statistical information etc. associated with the links listed below. Any opinions, points of view, etc. are not necessarily shared by FAIR.
 

 

 

 

This Landmark Decision Protects Ontario Accident Victims From Their Own Lawyers

Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal announced a truly historic decision. One that is so important, it will fundamentally affect the legal rights of people in Ontario for generations.

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/michelle-francis/this-landmark-decision-protects-ontario-accident-victims-from-th_a_23003977/

Comments are closed.

Anti-SLAPP law to be tested at Ontario Court of Appeal

The court will hear arguments tomorrow in a case where a Toronto doctor is appealing a Superior Court decision that dismissed his libel action against a former head of the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association and ordered him to pay more than $310,000 in costs. Dr. Howard Platnick has also filed a Charter challenge against the Protection of Public Participation Act, in part on the grounds that it favours freedom of expression over damage to reputation.

http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/legalfeeds/3895/anti-slapp-law-to-be-tested-at-ontario-court-of-appeal.html

Comments are closed.

LSUC considers revamping contingency fee rules

After making changes to the rules about advertising and referral fees, the Law Society of Upper Canada has turned its attention toward contingency fees.

The LSUC’s Advertising and Fee Arrangements Issues Working Group released an interim report Monday that identified potential recommendations — including a cap — to make contingency fees more fair and reasonable.

http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/legalfeeds/3896/lsuc-considers-revamping-contingency-fee-rules.html

Comments are closed.

Ontario Court of Appeal certifies class action, takes law firm to task over contingency fee agreement

The Ontario Court of Appeal has rejected arguments from a Toronto law firm and one of its partners that they are immune from a class proceeding brought on behalf of former and current clients, upholding a class action certification granted by the Divisional Court.

https://www.thelawyersdaily.ca/personalinjury/articles/4010/ontario-court-of-appeal-certifies-class-action-takes-law-firm-to-task-over-contingency-fee-agreement

Comments are closed.

Court of Appeal gives the green light to class action suit against Neinstein LLP

The Ontario Court of Appeal has ruled that a class action lawsuit against personal injury law firm Neinstein LLP can proceed.

http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/legalfeeds/3881/court-of-appeal-oks-class-action-suit-against-neinstein-llp.html

Comments are closed.